I was not sure how exactly to approach this post so I have written and modified it multiple times over the past 24 hours. My initial reaction was frustration and anger over the perceptions of society, the medical community, and excuses which were put forward regarding the diagnosis of Type II diabetes for TV southern cook Paula Deen. I have since questioned why I am angry and frustrated and realized that neither emotion serves any purpose. I now am at a point where I am very sad for this woman because not only does she not get it but neither does most of society.
First, Type II diabetes is not a disease in the strict sense, sure it is a symptom of insulin resistance which is the result of poor lifestyle choices. Unfortunately, people latch onto the term disease in order to give it an excuse, a pass, a way to avoid responsibility. Mrs. Deen, when asked if it was related to her lifestyle, she emphasized that there are many factors and really made a point of emphasizing genetics. Now granted I will say that there is some weak evidence that some people are more genetically PRONE to getting diabetes, but that is no different than lung cancer in a smoker - sure some people are more PRONE from genetics to develop lung cancer if they smoke but its hard to ignore the elephant in the room - you still have to smoke! Paula Deen has Type II diabetes because she is overweight, she eats poorly, and she doesn't exercise. Her doctor and the pharmaceutical company she partnered with (big pharma is such a good samaritan) have her convinced that it really is not her fault and they have the tools to CONTROL her diabetes.
On the Today show article, they also talked to a "nutritionist" and she emphasized that it is really not what you eat but how much. I have to strongly object to this line of thinking, yes, quantity does have a role but quality is just as important if not moreso. The hormones of satiation and fat storage behave very differently with different types of food. Inflammation relating to different food types also plays a role so I find it very sad that supposed experts make such inaccurate statements. I remember the College nutrition professor that ate a twinkie diet for 60 days in order to show that number of calories is what really counts - sure he lost 20 pounds and his cholesterol improved but I would bet that in about six months of that diet I could find some pretty scary physiologic changes. You also have to question why a professor of nutrition had an initial BMI of 28.5 (nearly obese) to begin with, that would be like going to an obese personal trainer for exercise advice.
I am sad for Paula Deen because she is a victim of this system of misinformation. I would love to see her change her lifestyle - cook healthy and exercise - and cure her "disease" of diabetes. It really is that simple, we see this happen all the time with clients in our practice and do it without medication.

Recent Comments